TERIYAKI MADNESS Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), CA Impoundment Order

The Teriyaki Madness Franchise Disclosure Document (posted below), submitted for CA state registration in April, 2013, raised questions and objections from the California Department of Corporations – Securities Regulation Division.

(UnhappyFranchisee.Com)  The most serious of the objections was the financial condition of the franchisor.

The Teriyaki Madness franchisor reportedly had a whopping $218 in the bank and stockholders equity of $-25,726.68 (That’s right.  NEGATIVE $25,726.68)

CA Senior Corporations Counsel Shohreh Aram wrote:

Franchisor’s audited financial statements as of December 31, 2012 indicate that it has working capital of $218.  It does not appear that the franchisor has satisfied the requirements of Rule 310.313 for adequate financial arrangements to fulfill obligations in the offering

California Corporations Commissioner Jan Lynn Owen has issued an order that Teriyaki Madness franchise fees for any franchises sold in California must be placed in escrow and not released to the franchisor until the franchisee’s unit has is open for business.

Read:  Teriyaki Madness Impound Order

Additionally, Teriyaki Madness is required to include the following warning on its California FDD:

#4  The franchisee will be required to make an estimated initial investment ranging from $234,048 to $327,213.  this amount exceeds the Franchisor’s Stockholder Equity as of March, 2013 which is $-25,726.68.

CA Corporations Counsel Shohreh Aram raised the concern shared on UnhappyFranchisee.Com (read TERIYAKI MADNESS Franchise Warning) that Teriyaki Madness was being highly selective in including profitability numbers from only one “affiliate” (not franchise) location in its Item 19 Financial Performance Representation.

Teriyaki Madness Attorney Michael Drumm added the profitability for a second “affiliate” location, which was 28% lower than the first.  However, neither of these locations are Teriyaki Madness franchises, and neither pay royalties.

Read:  Teriyaki Madness CA Correspondence (includes required changes to Teriyaki Madness FDD).

Read:  Teriyaki Madness 2013 FDD (does NOT include CA-required changes).

READ:  Teriyaki Madness 2014 FDD (Franchise Disclosure Document)

Also read:

TERIYAKI MADNESS Franchise Warning

ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE TERIYAKI MADNESS FRANCHISE OPPORTUNITY?  SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.

Contact UnhappyFranchisee.com

Tags: Teriyaki Madness, Teriyaki Madness franchise, Teriyaki Madness FDD, Teriyaki Madness Franchise Disclosure Document, Teriyaki Madness franchise warning, Rod Arreola, Alan Arreola, Michael Haith, Franchise Sherpas

unhappyzee

Recent Posts

Does the InXpress Franchise Provide “True Freedom”?

The InXpress franchise promotes itself as the “perfect working from home opportunity” that puts its franchisees…

3 weeks ago

DONUTNV Franchise Owners Selling at a Loss [UPDATED]

Last year’s hot new franchise opportunity sometimes becomes this year’s discounted resale (and, in the…

1 month ago

DONUTNV Has Exited the Franchise Fastlane [Updated]

Not long ago, the DonutNV franchise was the sizzling hot new concept, hyped by commissioned…

1 month ago

PAINT Nail Bar Franchise Complaints (Part One)

PAINT Nail Bar franchise complaints continue to stream in from current & former franchisees across…

1 month ago

PAINT NAIL BAR Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) 2024 – Discussion Invited

The PAINT Nail Bar franchise is promoted as the “opportunity of a lifetime” by franchisors…

1 month ago

PAINT NAIL BAR Franchise: Do Franchisees Recommend the PAINT Nail Bar Franchise?

Mark & Michele Schlossberg claim the PAINT Nail Bar franchise is “the opportunity of a…

2 months ago