Mark Golob, founder of the failed Butterfly Life fitness chain, sued blogger and web publisher Sean Kelly for $35,000,000 for unflattering statements he made about Golob’s “history of litigation” and “checkered past” on Kelly’s UnhappyFranchisee.Com website.

Sean Kelly, represented by San Francisco attorney Peter Lagarias, filed for a Motion to Strike under the California anti-SLAPP law.

Judge Richard J. Henderson ruled “the court has found that defendant Sean Kelly made a prima facie showing by admissible evidence that the challenged statements set forth in defendant Sean Kelly’s unhappyfranchisee.com website were made in a ‘public forum in connection with an issue of public interest’”

“Defendant Kelly has prevailed on his motion and is entitled to the recovery of his attorney fees incurred in this motion…”

Read Sean Kelly’s account here:  $35,000,000 Lawsuit Backfires on Health Club Franchisor

The case files are listed below.

Initial Summons:  Golob v. Kelly

February 5, 2014

Golob v. Kelly (UnhappyFranchisee.Com)

February 24, 2014

Letter from Nikolaus Reed to Sean Kelly

 

Kelly/Lagarias Motion to Strike

March 14, 2014

Declaration of Sean Kelly

Notice of Motion to Strike

Memorandum of Points and Authorities

Request for Judicial Notice

Exhibit A Part 1

Exhibit A Part 2, B, C1, C2, D, E, F, G, H, I J1

Exhibit J-2, K, L, M

 

Golob/Reed Opposition to Motion to Strike

March 28, 2014

Declaration of Mark Golob

Mark Golob’s Objection to SK Declaration

Mark Golob’s Points and Authorities

 

Kelly/Lagarias Reply to Golob’s Opposition

April 2, 2014

Reply Declaration of Sean Kelly

Kelly Reply to Evidentiary Objections

Reply MPA Points and Authorities

Objection to Mark Golob’s Declaration Evidence

 

Judge Henderson’s Decision

May 21, 2014

Judge Henderson’s Decision in Golob v. Kelly

WHAT DO YOU THINK? SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.

Contact UnhappyFranchisee.com

TAGS: Mark Golob, Nikolaus Reed, SLAPP lawsuit, Anti-SLAPP lawsuit, Unhappy Franchisee, Sean Kelly, Peter Lagarias, 1st Amendment lawsuit, Defamation lawsuit, Butterfly Life, Frivolous lawsuit, franchise bullying

unhappyzee

Recent Posts

Does the InXpress Franchise Provide “True Freedom”?

The InXpress franchise promotes itself as the “perfect working from home opportunity” that puts its franchisees…

2 weeks ago

DONUTNV Franchise Owners Selling at a Loss [UPDATED]

Last year’s hot new franchise opportunity sometimes becomes this year’s discounted resale (and, in the…

1 month ago

DONUTNV Has Exited the Franchise Fastlane [Updated]

Not long ago, the DonutNV franchise was the sizzling hot new concept, hyped by commissioned…

1 month ago

PAINT Nail Bar Franchise Complaints (Part One)

PAINT Nail Bar franchise complaints continue to stream in from current & former franchisees across…

1 month ago

PAINT NAIL BAR Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) 2024 – Discussion Invited

The PAINT Nail Bar franchise is promoted as the “opportunity of a lifetime” by franchisors…

1 month ago

PAINT NAIL BAR Franchise: Do Franchisees Recommend the PAINT Nail Bar Franchise?

Mark & Michele Schlossberg claim the PAINT Nail Bar franchise is “the opportunity of a…

2 months ago