LIBERTY TAX SERVICE Franchise Complaints

UnhappyFranchisee.com asked: Are LIBERTY TAX SERVICE Franchise Owners Happy? If you’re familiar with the Liberty Tax franchise, please share a comment below.

Entrepreneur magazine has ranked the Liberty Tax Service franchise #3 behind  McDonald’s & Subway.  However, some commenters who claimed to be former Liberty Tax franchisees left stern warnings on the Franchise-chat forum.

This post was originally published 

BostonTax wrote:

I’m a former Liberty Tax Franchisee

I hope you are ready for a little enlightenment! I held a successful Liberty Tax Franchise for 5 years until I decided to let the franchise agreement lapse. I did this for a few reasons:
1. The royalty fees were outrageous! 14% went to normal royalty while and ADDITIONAL 5% went for so called advertising royalties. The ad royalties were supposed to be put back into your local market to build the brand name. This was never done! All advertising in addition to the ad royalty I had to pay for because it did not fit into Liberty’s concept of advertising. I don’t know exactly what the concept was because our AD could not give an answer and the approved methods changed by the week.
2. Corporate was totally unresponsive to the needs of the franchisees. The AD system is designed to recruit anyone who can write a check for 100K. No other skills or ability required.
3. The minute you are behind in a royalty payment, they send you a notice to cure. After that, if you don’tpay, they try to terminate your franchise agreement.
4. Upon termination, Liberty enforces through legal proceeding a 2 year, 25 mile radis non compete clause that is in the franchise agreement. This is enforceable in the Eastern Division of the Federal District court, where, at least 2 Liberty friendly judges preside.
5. Liberty does not recognize chargebacks for bad debts as an adjustment for your royalty fees. All royalties are based on your gross, not your net collectable. This was an ongoing issue with them and the accounting department did not have the ability or the inclination to resolve!
My best advice is do not go with these guys, they are bad news. If you like to have people collect royalties and provide no support, then this is the franchise for you! It is very expensive to get into, the initial fee is around $32K just to buy the territory plus those pesky royalties. You can’t make money on this concept.

Most of the surviving franchisees I’ve talked to in the last 2 years have experienced great difficulty not only in making a profit, but in the corporate support or lack thereof.Remember, 19% of your gross is getting kicked back to Liberty, which is excessive by any standards. Please do yourself a favor and call former franchisees ,those that are currently getting sued (they are very likely to talk, as I found out), and current ones to try to get the straight poop.

Barbara Green wrote:

I too was a Liberty Tax Franchisee and I agree with everything you said.

The only reason for purchasing any franchise is because the business model is a proven marketing success as evidenced by the profitable franchisees. That is why you pay a license fee of $25,000. Being profitable is not in the cards for a Liberty Tax franchisee. Liberty Tax’s market/ business model is aimed at individuals who have very simple tax returns, i.e one W-2 and standard deduction which is why they were very successful in Norfolk, Va. That market is full of military people with one w-2.

Liberty will sell anyone a franchise at any location, in any georgraphic area, even if there is not a chance in hell of the franchisee being successful.

At one time, I too owned a Liberty Tax Franchise for one tax season. It was only one season because of the behavior of the Regional Manager who called me on January 15th demanding and screaming “Why had I not generated 200 tax returns and that maybe this business was not for me. I was stunned and confused since employers are given until January 31st. to give w-2’s to employees. Apparently, he thought that I was in Norfolk, Va. where that is possible.

It only goes downhill from there. The bottom line is I lost all of my investment in this businees (approx. $80,000) because I closed it rather than becoming a victim of this unethical company. NOthing would make me happier than to be a part of a class action lawsuit.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?  DO YOU OR HAVE YOU OWNED A LIBERTY TAX SERVICE FRANCHISE?  ARE LIBERTY TAX SERVICE FRANCHISEES HAPPY?  WHY OR WHY NOT?
.

unhappyzee

View Comments

  • The IRS has not stated why they had the problem this year. Last year the IRS was hacked, and 104K files were a problem.

  • Two different things going on there. Guest is right that the delay in IRS processing the returns (most not funded until 2/10) was all IRS for whatever reason. That's not Liberty corporate's fault. However that's not the delay others are talking about with Zees getting paid. That was all corporate. The payments for 2/10 refunds came to Liberty on evening of 2/8 (some of the Netspend refunds for 2/10 processed then), or at WORST morning of 2/9. Usually then franchisees get their ACH notice the next day, so 2/10. Many did not get paid until a day or two after that. Call it a technological glitch, a cashflow problem, a pure quantity issue, I'm not sure what it was. However, that was the delay that corporate did have control over. Many had the 1st payroll from peak payable that Friday, so a delay of a couple days was critical.

    Something is indeed up with the IRS this year, but corporate dropped the ball yet again too. Hopefully they get it under control and rest of year is smooth. I'm less concerned with the delays than I am with the drop in number of filer using paid preparers so far YTD. Not just Liberty but industry wide. That is down 10% as of 2/5. Lots and lots of preparers are going to be struggling and I'm very curious to see the big 3's numbers once they announce. Don't go simply by fees or returns. Back out freebies and also remember on Liberty end that everyone that got a loan has inflated Liberty's sales by $45, as they are counting those in the sales figures, but the Zees never really get that money as they are paying it out (a $250 return with a loan only really is a $205 return to the Zee). It would be like them counting the bank fees in their sales figures. To get "real" year to year comparison, they'd need to announce sales, then subtract the # of loans x $45. Also should only be reported as the number of paying returns, with freebies being a separate category. Then you'd know the real health of the stores. Won't see any of this detail though, as it's not required, but that's unfortunate. Would really like them to report number of stores up in paid return count, and number that are down. That would be an interesting read.

  • One thing that Liberty has not thought about is the long term effects that charging everyone that receives an advance the $45 dollars. If word about it gets out, the zee's will be the ones that will catch the flack. The taxpayers will not come back and they will start crying long and loud about being ripped off.
    Through banks working with Drake we were given the same option for the advance. The problem we had, was that if we chose that option we would have had an additional $30 dollar fee applied to all bank customers. We did not choose that option. Our commitment to our clients to bring them professional work at a reasonable cost would not all us have that charge to all bank products. Even though only a few would want an advance.

  • Out and glad: If I understand what your saying the banks offset the cost of offering this product and possible losses from offering the advance by charging all bank customers an additional $35.00. Figures Liberty would be involved in it.

  • We were not to add $45 fee for the loan just to those customers that got it, that was strict regulation. That said, I'm sure most Zees figured out the % of loan customers for early season, and then added a fee to all returns to cover that money (say $35 or something similar). Problem is, they also do that for $50 CIF. In the end, you are adding $70-100 to each return in gimmicks and fluff. The customer is getting this back in the form of the $50 + a "free" loan per say, but all they see in the end is that their return fee was $400. They don't think about the extras. Some aren't concerned about the fee, but many are. Hence the sharp decrease in numbers this year. You can only play the shell game so long. What I'm saying is that when corporate reports sales, they back out CIF and don't include bank fees. This year though they will include the extra fluff added for loans. That is in essence a falsely inflated sales figure, even if it's legally correct. The owners are not really making that, as it goes to the bank, same as the RT processing fee. If even half of the customers in the early season got this, that will inflate the sales figure by at close to 10% probably. $45 extra for half the return on top of an ANF of $300. This means if they aren't reporting at least a +10% sales growth, they are really flat or declining YTD.

  • You only need to be concerned about the advance if lots of folks took it. Did'nt have to worry about prep down until now. I think mid and late season could be a problem. Had a great start. By the way, not a plant (so sorry). Maybe you noticed Block had gimmicks this year also. We have a good start for rest of season due to the early start. I don't think it worked for everyone but early start was good idea. Self prepared with help and apps will kill stores that don't have experienced staffers. I think that goes for all of us. Lib. JH. Block Mom and Pops. Still busy so far.

  • Bill, the adding of $30 dollars to all bank products would have been required since we are considered a mom and pop. That would have been on top of the normal $28 dollar charge.
    Since Liberty is larger, they might have a different amount.
    No matter what it was not cost effective for our customers.

  • IRS stats as of 2/5 show paid prep down 10% and total returns down as well through 2/5. Self prep was up 3%. Total IRS returns down 1 million YTD. It's kind of weird. Unless the 1095A/B/C's are confusing people and they are delaying filing. Unemployment has actually improved, so there should be more people filing, even if it was self prep. I'm not sure what the stats are pointing too, just what they are.

Recent Posts

Building Kids Worldwide Franchise Owners May Establish a Franchisee Association

Recent developments have left franchisees worried and uncertain about their futures.  To advocate for greater…

2 weeks ago

Building Kidz Worldwide Franchise: Is It a Great Opportunity?

The Building Kidz Worldwide franchise is an opportunity to own a preschool & childcare center…

2 weeks ago

PAINT NAIL BAR Franchise Update

PAINT NAIL BAR has undergone some significant changes since franchisees contacted us with their complaints,…

2 weeks ago

Is HOMEVESTORS a Great Franchise for Veterans? U.S. Veterans Magazine Says It Is.

U.S. Veterans magazine has removed JDog Brands as its #1 "Best Franchises for Veterans" list.…

4 weeks ago

Truth For Veterans: Letter to U.S. Veterans Magazine, Mona Lisa Faris

More than 400 Veterans & military families who invested in JDog Brands franchises have failed,…

1 month ago

Franchise Reality Check Launches Brutally Honest Podcast

Genevieve McDaniel is a former franchisee turned franchise researcher, franchisee advocate, advisor and fiercely honest…

1 month ago