Earlier this year, Curves International Inc. chief executive Gary Heavin, said that high SBA loan defaults were a result of “the overpriced resales of franchises between third parties.”

On an earlier post on Unhappy Franchisee (See CURVES: Disturbing Resale Story), a Curves franchise buyer of two existing clubs provides an example of how a resale business can be artificially, even fraudulently, inflated.  The results can be disastrous for the unsuspecting buyer.

The Curves franchise owner writes:

I am a Curves resale. I bought 2 clubs from a friend of the family, who I thought was a good person. She claimed Curves International told her to base the purchase price of her clubs, on the number of “active” members. When I bought my clubs, an active member was any member who had not canceled their membership. Therefore, the previous owner came up with the purchase price this way, (500 members x 12 months x $29 (plus tax) ~ $175,000 x 2 clubs ~ $350,000).

However, the new franchisee claims that a large percentage of the 1000 supposed members had actually cancelled their memberships and didn’t know their bank accounts were still being charged for their monthly fees.

When we bought the clubs, we switched from paper drafts to an electronic drafting system. A month later we started getting calls from women who were threatening to sue us for taking money from them without permission. I explained that I was the new owner, that they were still under contract, and based on my knowledge, the previous owner was drafting them when I bought the clubs. They argued with me and said they had cancelled their contracts, and they had not been getting drafted from Curves until we started drafting them.

How were 600 women billed for a service they had cancelled without them noticing?  Turns out that the previous owners’ charges appeared on their bank statements simply as “merchant.”  When the new owner switched to an electronic system that identified the charges as “Curves,” all hell broke loose.

I asked them to bring in a bank statement from any month prior, and the current months statement. When they brought in their statements, we discovered that the previous owners draft was coming out as “Merchant”. They didn’t realize they were being drafted until they saw our “Curves” draft. Over the next 3 months, we had over 300 women cancel in each club.

The lesson to be learned?  When doing your due diligence, do thorough and rigorous due diligence… hopefully with the help of a professional who knows these kinds of tricks and nuances, and knows the warning signs.

And keep in mind the wise words of my favorite doctor:

I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind.
Some come from ahead and some come from behind.

Dr. Seuss

WHAT DO YOU THINK?  SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.

Read other comments on this story here: 

Photo: Bobu.  Licensed by Creative Commons.

unhappyzee

View Comments

Recent Posts

DonutNV Franchise Failures, Closures & Transfers: An Interactive List

DonutNV & Franchise Fastlane sold 276 DonutNV franchise territories to 130 franchisees in less than…

4 days ago

DONUTNV Franchise Owners Selling at a Loss

Last year’s hot new franchise opportunity sometimes becomes this year’s discounted resale (and, in the…

6 days ago

DonutNV MultiUnit NC Franchisees Left the System. Not Disclosed?

DonutNV franchise owners who invested in multiple territories reportedly left the system in late 2023. …

1 week ago

DonutNV 2nd Franchisee Daryl Poe Not Disclosed… Anywhere?

Daryl Poe was celebrated as DonutNV’s 2nd franchisee.  The local paper states that he operates…

2 weeks ago

DONUTNV Franchisee Mike Flowers Not Disclosed in FDDs?

I read a lot of Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs).  Most are pretty straightforward and make…

2 weeks ago

DonutNV Franchise Owners John & Dana Owens, Ocala, FL, Not Disclosed

In a video interview Franchise Sidekick celebrates their clients, John & Dana Owens, becoming DonutNV…

3 weeks ago